The trademark CITY VIRTUAL was filed by NEXUSMIND, S.L., a corporation established under the laws of the Kingdom of Spain (the "Applicant"). The application was published for oppositions on March 30, 2008, and received undefined oppositions.
Opposition Proceedings
There are undefined oppositions were filed:
The first opposition filed on June 29, 2008 by Citigroup Inc. on (a) Likelihood of confusion, (b) Unfair advantage and detriment to distinctiveness or repute. the opponent was represented by HOGAN LOVELLS and its proceedings were handled in English
The second opposition filed on June 29, 2008 by Citibank, N.A. on (a) Likelihood of confusion, (b) Unfair advantage and detriment to distinctiveness or repute. the opponent was represented by HOGAN LOVELLS and its proceedings were handled in English
The third opposition filed on June 29, 2008 by PT COMUNICAÇÕES, S.A. on (a) Likelihood of confusion, (b) Unfair advantage and detriment to distinctiveness or repute. the opponent was represented by C/M/S RUI PENA, ARNAUT & ASSOCIADOS and its proceedings were handled in English
The fourth opposition filed on June 23, 2008 by CITY CALL TELECOMUNICACIONES, S.L. on Likelihood of confusion. and its proceedings were handled in ES
The application was filed in Spanish, and Spanish was also language of all opposition proceedings (English was selected as the second language).
The renewal of the trademark was recorded by the office on August 24, 2018.
of the trademark registration was recorded on August 24, 2018.
The Appeal with reference B R0467/2011-2 was Opposition rejected according to Article 8 CTMR with decision issued on January 24, 2012 by the EUIPO. The Opposition with reference B 001334962 was rejected according to Article 8(1)(b) CTMR with decision issued on December 22, 2010 by the EUIPO. The Opposition with reference B 001334970 was rejected according to Article 8(1)(b) CTMR with decision issued on December 22, 2010 by the EUIPO. The Opposition with reference B 001344169 was rejected according to Article 8(1)(b) CTMR with decision issued on January 27, 2010 by the EUIPO. The Opposition with reference B 001347261 was rejected according to Rule 20(1) CTMIR with decision issued on January 27, 2010 by the EUIPO.
Goods And Services
The mark was filed in class 35 with following description of goods:
Advertising
Business management
Business administration
Office functions.
The mark was filed in class 36 with following description of goods:
Insurance
Financial affairs
Monetary affairs
Real estate affairs.
The mark was filed in class 38 with Telecommunications.
The mark was filed in class 41 with following description of goods: